Western New York Mountain Bicycling Association Forum Index
 HomeHome    SearchSearch    The LoungeThe Lounge    Trail Guide/Conditions!Trail Guide/Conditions!   CalendarCalendar  AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Site Navigation
WNYMBA
   Home
   About WNYMBA
   Contact us
   Join
   Newsletter
   Meeting Minutes
Advocacy
   Allegany Master Plan
   WNY MTB Patrol
   Trail Work Dates
   Erie Parks Masterplan
   FLT/NCT Access
Riding
   Where to Ride
   Map Central
   Photos
Events
   WNYMBA MTB fest
   Roots Rocks & Ridges
   SWAP Meet
   Raccoon Rally
   Racing (N)
   Racing (S)
   Racer (up)
Lounge (leaving WNYMBA)
   The Lounge
   Lounge Users
   Lounge FAQ
   Search Posts

Links
WNYMBA SWAP
WNYMBA Fest
Roots, Rocks, and Ridges
Raccon Rally
DirtRag Supports WNYMBA
IMBA

Statistics
We have 1522 registered Lounge users, most of whom are not WNYMBA members. Join Today!
The newest registered Lounge user is chalmej

Our users have posted a total of 29269 articles within 3093 topics
 
Allegheny National Forest and Wilderness Designation
Allegheny National Forest Access
Wilderness Designations Would Close Trails to Bikes!
The Ten-Second Take-Home Message
  • Forest Service has just released their draft Forest Plan Alternatives.
  • Three areas (including the two closest areas to Buffalo) are retained as possible Wilderness Designation Candidates
  • Public Hearing set for June 2 in Warren, PA
  • We would support Wilderness Designation if it didn't mean automatic bicycle bans
  • Let the forest service know:
    • That you want increased bicycling opportunities, and that Wilderness Desination would reduce bicycling opportunities
    • That you support removal of Morrison Run from future Wilderness Designation consideration.
    • That the new Remote Recreation Area concept (MA 7.2) is a good idea and should include bicycle access
Contact info:

Mail: Forest Plan Revision

Allegheny National Forest

PO Box 36,

Warren, PA 16365

Fax: 814-726-1465

Email: r9_allegheny_nf@fs.fed.us


What's up with the ANF and biking now
Riding in ANFThe Allegheny National Forest is the closest national forest to Buffalo, is huge, and has a lot of great biking.  According to the ANF biking web page, most areas are open, except for wilderness areas, proposed wilderness areas, and three designated scenic/research/experimental sections. The NCT and the trails around the Reservior (National Recreation Area) are also closed.

The best riding close to Buffalo is on Willow Creek ATV Trail (although you have to share that with motorized users) and Morrison Run (very popular with hikers - yield the trail to them.  Expert riding only)

The fact that only a few trails are closed to biking means that there is lots of good riding.  However, trail conditions vary widely as there hasn't been too great an emphasis on recreational trails within the forest. 
What's happening now and could it mean more or less biking?

ANF mapCurrently, the Forest Service is revising the Forest Plan for this Forest.  This could mean lots of changes.  Read about it all at the Forest Service's Plan Revision Web Page.  

This web page is finally up on the WNYMBA web site (after much delay) because the Forest Service just released their Draft Forest Plan Alternatives and is holding two Public Hearings in early June.

While the new plan will cover lots of ground, of concern to cyclists is that there are two citizen's groups pushing for (slightly different) new designations of Federal Wilderness within the forest.  Federal Wilderness means no biking at all.

If you aren't up on the Wilderness issue, this link is a good start.  In short, we'd gladly support some Wilderness Designation, which could help promote and maintain some great trails, but only if (some) trails were open to biking.  While there is good reason to believe that Congress didn't intend Wilderness to be closed to biking, the fact is that new Wilderness Designations will mean trails closed to bikes.

On the flip side, the new management plan could help promote recreational trails within the forest, increasing biking opportunities.  So despite the threat of Wilderness designations, some new riding opportunities could be developed, we don't know.
Why is Wilderness Designation Being Considered?
There are two separate citizen's groups pushing for Wilderness Designation:
These groups have the laudable goal of promoting recreational uses within the forest as compared to the now prevalent focus on forest product harvests.  In fact, the Allegheny Wild proposal states

As a whole, the Allegheny National Forest is lacking in its promotion of quality recreation activities. ... Trails are few in the Allegheny. The Forest Service does not do enough to promote the use of trails within the Allegheny. ... There is an overall deficiency in the number of miles of trails when compared to other national forests in the eastern region. The poor distribution of assets addresses all types of low-impact recreation including hiking, skiing, bicycling, horseback riding, camping, and backpacking.

But whether or not they truly understand the impacts of Wilderness on biking, the fact is that Wilderness Designation will prevent biking within the boundaries.
Where is Wilderness Designation Being Pushed?
The two separate groups pushing for slightly different Wilderness Designations.  But each group's proposals focus on the areas closest to us.

MorrisonBoth groups are calling for Wilderness at the fantastic Morrison Run area (FAW's Morrison Run Wilderness and AW's Chappelle Fork Wilderness)

JohnnycakeBoth groups also want to designate the land between Tracy Ridge and the Willow Creek ATV trail (including the existing old section of the old Johnny Cake Trail) as "W" (FAW's Chestnut Ridge Wilderness and AW's Sugar Run Wilderness)

FAW also wants to have both sides of the Reservoir designated as Wilderness, as seen in their Proposed Tracy Ridge and Cornplanter Wilderness Proposals (bikes are currently not allowed in the Tracy Ridge area - between Willow Bay and Sugar Bay)

Further Afield (to the south), both groups would establish Wilderness in the Tionesta area.
What do the Forest Service Alternatives Say about Wilderness?  About Biking?
Specifically, the Alternatives Document says:

"The ANF has conducted an inventory of its lands for wilderness and identified three areas as meeting the inventory criteria for possible inclusion within the national wilderness system. An evaluation of these three areas for wilderness will be conducted as part of the environmental analysis of the plan revision. These three areas are called Tracy Ridge, Chestnut Ridge, and Minister Valley. Each of these areas will be identified for wilderness in one or more of the alternatives under consideration."

The good news is that it appears Morrison Run is off the table.  But it's never over until it is over.  The Forest Service needs to hear from us to support removal of Morrison Run from Wilderness consideration.

The Alternatives Document does not say much about bicycles in particular, except to say

"No other direction regarding trail uses will vary by alternative, except as an outcome of assigned management area direction. Designated Equestrian Use Areas (EUAs) will be identified as areas for equestrian trails. Plan decisions will be modified to address the other components of trail use (snowmobiles, bike trails, cross country skiing, and hiking) and their design (e.g. loop trails, conversion of abandoned roads, and North Country NST)"

However, Equestrians currently have extensive access to existing trails (like bikes) but would be limited to just 12% of the forest under plan alternatives.  Similar limitations could conceivably be extended to bikes.

Additionally, the Forest Service proposes:

"To respond to the issue of providing increased semi-primitive recreation opportunities, the ANF is proposing to create a new management area (MA 7.2), more generally called a remote recreation area. This management area is managed primarily to provide increased non-motorized recreation opportunities in a natural setting. It will be considered in areas where current road density and oil/gas development is low. There will be no further construction of Forest Service roads in these areas and where feasible, existing roads can be decommissioned. These areas will not be available for regularly scheduled timber harvest, but minimum management activities to maintain healthy forest conditions and promote old growth characteristics for wildlife core habitat areas and scenery are appropriate. This management area is considered in the alternatives for the Minister Valley and Chestnut Ridge potential wilderness areas and for 7 other areas: Clarion River, Morrison, South Cornplanter, Longhouse, Hearts Content, East Hickory Creek, and Lamentation Run."

This could be good or bad depending on how they view "non-motorized recreation".
What do you think?
Discuss this issue in the Allegheny National Forest Trail Conditions/Wilderness Designation Forum.




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group