- Posts: 99
- Thank you received: 0
650B vs 29er
Sometimes I ride straight past the hump, sometimes I ride clockwise so I go down the hump and sometimes I had a few to many pale ales the day before and I walk the hump.
Ever since Slidersguy and Scotto fixed the ditch this spring it is easy to ride.
I'm learning italian and moving to Cortina!
I'm an SB rider and I agree with Boogemans opinion. And I often walk up the hump too
2009 Kingdom Trails Lightning Chaser MVP
2010 Asheville MVP
Fear the clown wheels!
"CX bikes are for bisexuals....you are either gay or straight...not both" -Trailhunter
"While we used lifts to access the area's high mountain trails, there was still plenty of climbing to be had - much of it steep and taken at redline."
I doubt that the majority of Sprauge Brook riders would agree with your opinion. Like the ones I see pushing their bikes up "the hump" or out of "the ditch".......
Not very fast but havin' fun!
Here is what Trek has to say on 650b. They also threw in a couple pictures of a place a little better than Sprauge Brook
I just don't understand why 29ers have never really evolved (or that very few companies have released anything) from the original way of thinking that they needed steeper head angles even with all of the development on longer travel/'all mountain' bikes. Then 650b comes along and immediately has the same head angle as the 26er. Maybe 650b does have some merit because the chainstays do get really long on a lot of full suspension 29ers.
There are some big companies starting to try things out though like kona, diamondback and now Trek with the stache. Obviously a long travel hardtail is a niche market but its nice to have choices and see some departure from the norm.
I think Garrick mentioned the head angle difference because there are not many 29'ers out there with slack head angles which is more stable and not as quick. Steep/quick head angles are good for steep climbs and super tight slow trails but they ar enot as much fun on faster stuff.
You are not logged in.