Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Are 26ers dead?

Re: Are 26ers dead? 2 years 2 weeks ago #43986

  • TGS
  • TGS's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 60
boogenman wrote:
GT had a few 650b MTB bikes in the early 90's. it was always a pain in the neck trying to explain to customers that their bike was basically useless if it had a bad tires or a tweaked rim. Rim brakes=26 wheels couldn't be swapped out.

I'm also waiting for the dust to settle until my next mountain bike purchase.

Ah yeah. It keeps the industry in business too to come out with the next big thang;-) !
Ride fast and look good
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Are 26ers dead? 2 years 1 month ago #43876

drabb wrote:
Scotto wrote:
Don't forget Rabb Himself. Here is a pic of Dan during one of his better water crossing moments.
Guess that all depends on how you define 'better.' Figured a few pics of me with cold feet would've surfaced by now. 8-)
Maybe a few pics of you with cold feet, but I think the video shows it best.
Still an awesome weekend of riding. My only comment to the question that started this thread (are 26ers dead?) is ride what feels best for you.
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Are 26ers dead? 2 years 1 month ago #43875

GT had a few 650b MTB bikes in the early 90's. it was always a pain in the neck trying to explain to customers that their bike was basically useless if it had a bad tires or a tweaked rim. Rim brakes=26 wheels couldn't be swapped out.

I'm also waiting for the dust to settle until my next mountain bike purchase.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Are 26ers dead? 2 years 1 month ago #43872

  • TJ_Zydel
  • TJ_Zydel's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Director of Marketing and Promotions
  • Posts: 435
Jon Sundquist wrote:
Painfulldischarge wrote:
I think the more interesting question is: why are they dropping down to a 650b, if the 29ner is the be all end all?
That's an interesting take. I had always seen the 650B getting popular as the replacement for the 26" wheels. A way for people who don't want to go to 29" but still want the advantages of the bigger wheels.

Don't get me wrong. I am no partisan. I was pretty late to the party switching to a 29er. Whatever is the most fun is best for that person. I have a lot more fun on the 29er. I am not a racer.

I would also point out that it takes a little while to get used to the bigger wheels. If you only do one ride on a 29er coming from the small wheels, I don't think you can make a judgment. I don't knwo what I adjusted (I could never be a coach), but after several rides and dialing in the geometry over and over again, my 29er handles just as well and is just as fun as the old 26".

isn't there a lot of old data about how 650b was supposed to be the main wheel size for mtb but 26 was the original bmx/crusier wheel and since all the main asia suppliers had crazy inventory and were tool'd up for 26 it was forced into the market place as being the dominant wheel size? Tom Ritchey had 650b bikes and wheels in the 80's but it never took off. i am very interested in 650b for full suspension, but i cannot see ditching my 29'er hardtail...i would like to ride a good full suspension bike again, i am just torn between what the industry, press, and public are trying to figure out. that and i don't want a 30 lb bike...i know still working on the beer gut too...
ahhhhh dude...

facebook.com/wnymba

twitter.com/wnymba

Director of Marketing and Promotions
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Are 26ers dead? 2 years 1 month ago #43870

  • drabb
  • drabb's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 112
Scotto wrote:
Don't forget Rabb Himself. Here is a pic of Dan during one of his better water crossing moments.
Guess that all depends on how you define 'better.' Figured a few pics of me with cold feet would've surfaced by now. 8-)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Are 26ers dead? 2 years 1 month ago #43867

boogenman wrote:
slower_than_u wrote:

. We were planning on riding in Pisgah on day three until the guy at the local bike shop said "nothing you can ride in Dupont will prepare you for pisgah.

What does that mean?

Dupont is fun, but it's small and there's really nothing difficult or technical there.

Pisgah is massive, and you can get into some really gnarly terrain a loooong way from where you parked. Just driving into that place is a journey.

Without knowing the riding level of the people he was talking to, it's the safe thing for him to say.
The 1970's: No knee pads, helmets, brakes, or over cautious soccer mom's. It's just how we rolled...
The administrator has disabled public write access.

You are not logged in.

Time to create page: 0.264 seconds

Our insurance company has "strongly suggested" that we tell you that Mountain Biking can be dangerous. If you're visiting this site it's very likely that you're already aware that if you insist on having a good time by riding your mountain bike, eventually you will almost certainly fall down and collect any number of boo-boos, dings and injuries, serious or otherwise, but we have to tell you anyway.

Mountain Biking is a potentially hazardous activity carrying a significant risk of bodily injury and even death. Mountain biking should only be undertaken if you have a complete awareness of these risks. You can reduce the level of risk by wearing a helmet and by riding within your own skill level.